0.05/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.05/0.12 % Command : run_Leo-III---1.5 %s %d 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.33 % CPULimit : 960 0.10/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.10/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 2 07:28:16 EDT 2020 0.10/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.10/0.34 % Leo-III: Strategy 1 (for '60') 183.89/49.37 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode. 183.89/49.37 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(60) with strategy 183.89/49.37 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover. 183.89/49.37 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover. 183.89/49.37 % [INFO] Parsing finished. Scanning for conjecture ... 183.89/49.37 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 183.89/49.37 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 183.89/49.37 % [INFO] Type checking passed. Searching for refutation ... 183.89/49.37 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ... 183.89/49.37 % Time passed: 40742ms 183.89/49.37 % Effective reasoning time: 39727ms 183.89/49.37 % Solved by strategy 183.89/49.37 % Axioms used in derivation (0): 183.89/49.37 % No. of inferences in proof: 25 183.89/49.37 % No. of processed clauses: 94 183.89/49.37 % No. of generated clauses: 1808 183.89/49.37 % No. of forward subsumed clauses: 62 183.89/49.37 % No. of backward subsumed clauses: 11 183.89/49.37 % No. of ground rewrite rules in store: 39 183.89/49.37 % No. of non-ground rewrite rules in store: 1 183.89/49.37 % No. of positive (non-rewrite) units in store: 0 183.89/49.37 % No. of negative (non-rewrite) units in store: 40 183.89/49.37 % No. of choice functions detected: 0 183.89/49.37 % No. of choice instantiations: 0 183.89/49.37 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 40742 ms resp. 39727 ms w/o parsing 183.89/49.37 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 183.89/49.37 thf(c0_type, type, c0: $i). 183.89/49.37 thf(cS_type, type, cS: ($i > $i)). 183.89/49.37 thf(r_type, type, r: ($i > ($i > $o))). 183.89/49.37 thf(cIND_type, type, cIND: $o). 183.89/49.37 thf(cIND_def, definition, (cIND = (! [A:($i > $o)]: (((A @ c0) & ! [B:$i]: ((A @ B) => (A @ (cS @ B)))) => (! [B:$i]: (A @ B)))))). 183.89/49.37 thf(sk1_type, type, sk1: (($i > $o) > $i)). 183.89/49.37 thf(sk2_type, type, sk2: $i). 183.89/49.37 thf(1,conjecture,((((r @ c0 @ c0) & ! [A:$i,B:$i]: ((r @ A @ B) => (r @ (cS @ A) @ (cS @ B))) & (cIND)) => (! [A:$i]: ? [B:$i]: (r @ A @ B)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM130)). 183.89/49.37 thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (((r @ c0 @ c0) & ! [A:$i,B:$i]: ((r @ A @ B) => (r @ (cS @ A) @ (cS @ B))) & (cIND)) => (! [A:$i]: ? [B:$i]: (r @ A @ B))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])). 183.89/49.37 thf(3,plain,((~ (((r @ c0 @ c0) & ! [A:$i,B:$i]: ((r @ A @ B) => (r @ (cS @ A) @ (cS @ B))) & ! [A:($i > $o)]: (((A @ c0) & ! [B:$i]: ((A @ B) => (A @ (cS @ B)))) => (! [B:$i]: (A @ B)))) => (! [A:$i]: ? [B:$i]: (r @ A @ B))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])). 183.89/49.37 thf(6,plain,((r @ c0 @ c0)),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3])). 183.89/49.37 thf(8,plain,(! [B:$i,A:($i > $o)] : ((~ (A @ c0)) | (A @ (sk1 @ (A))) | (A @ B))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3])). 183.89/49.37 thf(16,plain,(! [B:$i,A:($i > $o)] : ((~ (A @ c0)) | (A @ (sk1 @ (A))) | (A @ B))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8])). 183.89/49.37 thf(343,plain,(! [B:$i,A:($i > $o)] : ((A @ (sk1 @ (A))) | (A @ B) | ((r @ c0 @ c0) != (A @ c0)))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[6,16])). 183.89/49.37 thf(414,plain,(! [A:$i] : ((r @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B))) @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B)))) | (r @ A @ A))),inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[343:[bind(A, $thf(^ [C:$i]: (r @ C @ C))),bind(B, $thf(B))]])). 183.89/49.37 thf(456,plain,(! [A:$i] : ((r @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B))) @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B)))) | (r @ A @ A))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[414])). 183.89/49.37 thf(4979,plain,(! [A:$i] : ((r @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B))) @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B)))) | ((r @ A @ A) != (r @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B))) @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B))))) | ~ ($true))),inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[456])). 183.89/49.37 thf(5018,plain,((r @ (sk1 @ (^ [A:$i]: (r @ A @ A))) @ (sk1 @ (^ [A:$i]: (r @ A @ A))))),inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[4979:[bind(A, $thf(sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B))))]])). 183.89/49.37 thf(5,plain,(! [B:$i,A:$i] : ((~ (r @ A @ B)) | (r @ (cS @ A) @ (cS @ B)))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3])). 183.89/49.37 thf(5074,plain,(! [B:$i,A:$i] : ((r @ (cS @ A) @ (cS @ B)) | ((r @ (sk1 @ (^ [C:$i]: (r @ C @ C))) @ (sk1 @ (^ [C:$i]: (r @ C @ C)))) != (r @ A @ B)))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5018,5])). 183.89/49.37 thf(5075,plain,((r @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (^ [A:$i]: (r @ A @ A)))) @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (^ [A:$i]: (r @ A @ A)))))),inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[5074:[bind(A, $thf(sk1 @ (^ [C:$i]: (r @ C @ C)))),bind(B, $thf(sk1 @ (^ [C:$i]: (r @ C @ C))))]])). 183.89/49.37 thf(7,plain,(! [B:$i,A:($i > $o)] : ((~ (A @ c0)) | (~ (A @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (A))))) | (A @ B))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3])). 183.89/49.37 thf(15,plain,(! [B:$i,A:($i > $o)] : ((~ (A @ c0)) | (~ (A @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (A))))) | (A @ B))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[7])). 183.89/49.37 thf(4,plain,(! [A:$i] : ((~ (r @ sk2 @ A)))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3])). 183.89/49.37 thf(17,plain,(! [A:$i] : ((~ (r @ sk2 @ A)))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[4])). 183.89/49.37 thf(38,plain,(! [C:$i,B:$i,A:($i > $o)] : ((~ (A @ c0)) | (~ (A @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (A))))) | ((A @ B) != (r @ sk2 @ C)))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15,17])). 183.89/49.37 thf(81,plain,(! [A:($i > $i)] : ((~ (r @ c0 @ (A @ c0))) | (~ (r @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ (A @ B))))) @ (A @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ (A @ B)))))))))),inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[38:[bind(A, $thf(^ [E:$i]: (r @ E @ (E @ E)))),bind(B, $thf(sk2)),bind(C, $thf(E @ sk2))]])). 183.89/49.37 thf(103,plain,(! [A:($i > $i)] : ((~ (r @ c0 @ (A @ c0))) | (~ (r @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ (A @ B))))) @ (A @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ (A @ B)))))))))),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[81])). 183.89/49.37 thf(5619,plain,(! [A:($i > $i)] : ((~ (r @ c0 @ (A @ c0))) | ((r @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B)))) @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ B))))) != (r @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ (A @ B))))) @ (A @ (cS @ (sk1 @ (^ [B:$i]: (r @ B @ (A @ B)))))))))),inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5075,103])). 183.89/49.37 thf(5661,plain,((~ (r @ c0 @ c0))),inference(pre_uni,[status(thm)],[5619:[bind(A, $thf(^ [B:$i]: (B)))]])). 183.89/49.37 thf(5681,plain,(~ ($true)),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[5661,6])). 183.89/49.37 thf(5682,plain,($false),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[5681])). 183.89/49.37 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 183.89/49.37 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ... 183.89/49.37 WARNING: TreeLimitedRun lost 2.89s, total lost is 2.89s 183.89/49.37 WARNING: TreeLimitedRun lost 28.95s, total lost is 31.84s 183.89/49.37 FINAL WATCH: 102.3 CPU 41.0 WC 183.89/49.37 Killed 4 orphans 183.89/49.37 Killed 4 orphans 183.89/49.37 EOF